Official Texas Proud Texas Rangers Baseball Shirt

 past few years, rapidly developing artificial intelligence tools, which can scan papers for irregularities, are supercharging their work. Now, scientific journals are adopting similar technology to try to prevent errors from reaching publication. In January, Science announced that it was using an artificial intelligence tool called Proofig to scan papers that were being edited and peer-reviewed for publication. Thorp, the Official Texas Proud Texas Rangers Baseball Shirt In addition,I will do this Science editor-in-chief, said the family of six journals added the tool “quietly” into its workflow about six months before that January announcement. Before, the journal was reliant on eye-checks to catch these types of problems. Thorp said Proofig identified several papers late in the editorial process that were not published because of problematic images that were difficult to explain and other instances in which authors had “logical explanations” for issues they corrected before publication. “The serious errors that cause us not to publish a paper are less than 1%,” Thorp said. In a statement, Chris Graf, the research integrity director at the publishing company Springer Nature, said his company is developing and testing “in-house AI image integrity software” to check for image duplications. Graf’s research integrity unit currently uses Proofig to help assess articles if concerns are raised after publication. Graf said processes varied across its journals, but that some Springer Nature publications manually check

images for manipulations with Adobe Photoshop tools and look for inconsistencies in raw data for experiments that visualize cell components or common scientific experiments. “While the Official Texas Proud Texas Rangers Baseball Shirt In addition,I will do this AI-based tools are helpful in speeding up and scaling up the investigations, we still consider the human element of all our investigations to be crucial,” Graf said, adding that image recognition software is not perfect and that human expertise is required to protect against false positives and negatives. No tool will catch every mistake or cheat. “There’s a lot of human beings in that process. We’re never going to catch everything,” Thorp said. “We need to get much better at managing this when it happens, as journals, institutions and authors.” Many science sleuths had grown frustrated after their concerns seemed to be ignored or as investigations trickled along slowly and without a public resolution. Sholto David, who publicly exposed concerns about Dana-Farber research in a blog post, said he largely “gave up” on writing letters to journal editors about errors he discovered because their responses were so insufficient. Elisabeth Bik, a microbiologist and longtime image sleuth, said she has frequently flagged image problems and “nothing happens.” Leaving public comments questioning research figures on PubPeer can start

Buy this shirt:  Official Texas Proud Texas Rangers Baseball Shirt

Home:  Luxurioushirt